Sunday, October 22, 2006

10 Ways to Find Suppliers


And so in the age where more folks want to be their own bosses, there has been a lot of people who are starting off in the retail sector, be it from online stores to retail chains. But no matter the scale of the business, one of the first questions which need to be answered would be "Where am I to look for suppliers / distributors?"

It may not be an easy question to answer but here are some tips you can use to find the distributors and suppliers for a particular range of products in your industry :

  1. Official Manufacturer Webpages - First stop made should be to the official website of the company whose product lines you aer trying to stock. They typically have a list of local/regional distributors whom can supply you.

  2. Online Trade Directories - Next thing which can be done without even leaving the house would be to check out online trade directories like Alibaba.com or Exporters.sg. It may be a little messy

  3. Online Forums - Joining an online forum which caters to a base of users of your product has multiple benefits. First, you may get to find out where the source of the goods are coming from and which retailers are doing well in the industry. Next, you get a feel the type of products consumers need and want to buy. Also, if you play you cards right, you may just be given the chance to sell to this group of key target consumers.

  4. Trade Shows - These should be deemed as the prilgrimmages needed if you are serious about being in the know and being the first to stock latest products. Typically, the only problem is that major trade shows are held only in the States or Europe so an overseas trip is inevitable (which can also be a great break if you take it that way).

  5. Trade Journals/Magazines - Second best approach if you cannot make it abroad to trade shows would then be to subscribe to a good trade journal where manufacturers tend to advertise their latest offerings. Don't try to save by getting a second-rate subcription as you may just be shortchanging yourself on valuable information.

  6. Phone Directory - Looking under the type of products you require would probably net you the contact details of a couple of importers and general traders who bring in the line of stuff you want. Simple.

  7. Distributor's Labels - For smaller items (especially for foodstuff), the distributor may place their stickers on each individual box. A part of me think it may be for regulation purposes and another part thinks it may be a bid to get in touch with more retailers. In any case, such details are a good way to link in with the local distributor so keep an eye out for these!

  8. Packaging Cartons - Typically, goods come in packed in SKU of cartons and these may get strewn around in the shops. Taking a peek at the print on these boxes may yield some clue as to where they originated or passed through.

  9. Gift Floral Arrangements - This one is a particularly Singapore (I feel) angle on things but when a competitor (especially a large one) opens a new outlet, their main suppliers may make gifts of floral arrangements to congratule them. Though, these may not exactly give you more information over what you can find out using the preceeding methods, it does serve as a guage to the level of relatonship betwen the retailer and the supplier.

  10. Word on the Street - The last method, but some feel is the most important, is to know the word on the street. This means that you have to be talking to the suppliers you currenly have, the other retailers in the industry and to your own customers. These days, even customers may have read or heard about things in the industry you have not know about yet so keep your ears open!

So there you have it. It may sound simple but its only a start to the followup work that you have to do once contact is established. Most of the time, lack of volume / credit-worthiness / physical presence may be issues but not are not things that cannot be solved by some good ol' negotiation.

Have fun!

(PS: Just realised that for once, the google ads on this post's page may be pulling up pretty relevant stuff due to this content... :) )

Saturday, October 14, 2006

Educating kids out of their creativity

"All kids have tremendous talent [and creativity] and we are squandering it pretty ruthlessly ... creativity is as important in education as literacy and we shoud treat it with the same status"

- Sir Ken Robinson, TEDTalk 2006






[Watch other TEDTalk Videos here : http://www.ted.com/tedtalks ]

Friday, October 13, 2006

How to make posters stand out!


Here's a cool poster showing how designers of print can look at creative way to made them medium 3-d, interact with the surroundings and stand out!

Brillant!

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Google acquires youTube -- It's Official!

Ok, its official -- Google has announced its acquistion of youTube for $1.65Billion in stock.

From the official Press Release on the Google Site :

Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) announced today that it has agreed to acquire YouTube, the consumer media company for people to watch and share original videos through a Web experience, for $1.65 billion in a stock-for-stock transaction. Following the acquisition, YouTube will operate independently to preserve its successful brand and passionate community.


The acquisition combines one of the largest and fastest growing online video entertainment communities with Google's expertise in organizing information and creating new models for advertising on the Internet. The combined companies will focus on providing a better, more comprehensive experience for users interested in
uploading, watching and sharing videos, and will offer new opportunities for professional content owners to distribute their work to reach a vast new audience.


[via : Wired ]

Monday, October 09, 2006

Autopsy of how the youTube news Spread

By now, its pretty old news to any one who reads the news or keeps a lookout about all things tech-related to be aware of Google's US$1.6 Billion offer for youTube.

But that's not what I'm interested in looking at today, but how the ability to provide credible and timely information has shifted dramatically from the traditional media to what I would call (for lack of a better term) the new media, which generally encompasses a wide range of online technologies and platforms such as blogs, forums, news aggregators and RSS feeds.

This I think is the rough chronological order (timings are guesstimate at best) by which the word about this possible buyout spread:

  1. On the night of 6th Oct, Michael Arrington posted on TechCrunch (one of the most read blogs regarding Silicon Valley startups) about an unsubstantiated rumor that Google was offering $1.6 Bn for youTube. At this point, 113 thousand subscribers of the TechCrunch RSS Feed could have instantly had a copy of this news zapped to them when they opened their RSS readers.

  2. Quickly after the first post on Techcrunch, bloggers worldwide (including yours truely) scrambled to add their commentaries on the situation. New trackbacks appeared almost every 10-20 minutes. I would guess that since the news contains only 2 big names and a big dollar figure, it wasn't distorted too much. But interestingly, according to the trackbacks, it got translated into many other languages like German, Korean and Italian.

  3. Possibly still on the same night of the 6th or early on 7th Oct, word spread quickly through the blogosphere, further aided by the fact that it was got posted up on Digg, quickly attracting the attention of Digg users who then pushed it up in rank, commented on it and essentially spread the word. Easily a few more thousand online users (including Digg's RSS Feed Readers) got wind of the news.

  4. Another round of blogging on the subject by online denizens worlds. Blogosphere literally explodes with the news. According to Technorati, it seems like around 1000 more blogs posted with the keyword youTube.

  5. Finally, some time later, it was noted that Wall Street Journal reported on this news citing information from "a person familiar with the matter". Unfortunately, I couldn't get a good fix on when this happened. I couldn't get my hands on the article itself as it was subscribers only area so unless you could get your hands on a copy of the paper or subscribed to the online version, you wouldn't have heard zip from it.

  6. Hitwise jumps in the fun to provide some stats between youTube VS Google Video.

  7. Very much later, if you are from Singapore like me, you catch some word of it quoted in the Strait Times 3 days after Time-0, in a easily missed column snuggled inside the Financial Pages.

If you ask me, what just happened displayed a great shift in the way media production and consumption works today. Newspapers and other print media are now considered slow in comparison to what online alternatives can offer. the 4 channels of blogs, forums, news aggregators and RSS Feeds work in synergy and semi-automation explode news which are deemed (1) of general interest and (2) of some standard of credibility.

What happened here is a study of influence. To be able to generate and spread news that in a tsunami fashion in a matter of mere hours is something unfathomable before and frankly, a very serious threat that traditional media should be (and I think they are) aware of. Production of conventional media alone may take hours already, not to mention the collation, editing, verification and (after production), distribution of the media.

On the flipside, it is important to know that credibilty of traditional media is still something of a forte for them though the online generation is fast learning to accept lower levels of validation in exchange of a much more rapid speed of news transmission. Also, unlike print media, online information can be correctly much more rapidly also, making for more tolerance for errors, given that they are rectified promptly.

I don't profess to be an authority on how the new media may develop but from what I just saw from the youTube case, these are going to be interesting times indeed.


(PS: Phew, that was much longer than originally expected. Will try something shorter next time round)